[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120409143345.a7a8c257.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 14:33:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: shuahkhan@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:51:29 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com> wrote:
> >> First of all ramoops was born mainly for debug purpose and to help the
> >> maintainability of a product. I used it in systems where the uptime (so
> >> no reboot) was important. So it can be very useful for me load the
> >> module, gather logs and unload it for example. A kernel panic is not
> >> recoverable so the reboot is needed but it's not always true for a
> >> kernel oops.
> >>
> >> Marco
> >
> > What is the status of this patch? Don't see it in 3.3 and haven't
> > checked 3.4-rc1 yet.
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been hoping it would get into 3.4. It's in the -mm tree, and has
> been living in linux-next for a while. I'm not sure why it hasn't been
> merged into Linus's tree yet. Andrew, is there a reason it hasn't been
> merged?
The patch breaks ramoops module unloading. Tony says there's "no
credible end-user case" for this and Marco promptly provided one,
which was ignored.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists