linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl: fix pinmux_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F8257F7.60302@st.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:01:03 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl: fix pinmux_check_ops error checking

On 4/6/2012 9:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 06:18 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>> > From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>> > 
>> > Do not use get_functions_count before checking.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
> 
> IIRC, Viresh added some other get_*_count() functions in the same patch.
> Do we need any more fixes similar to the this for those too?

Might not be required as this patch handles the pinmux_check_ops() routine.
At other places ops is guaranteed to have correct value.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/