linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120410083130.GK24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:30 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 03:49:45PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I believe this patch fixes the amba probe failure that impacts any
> AMBA platform build with CONFIG_REGULATOR enabled.  Could you consider
> to send the fix for -rc soon?

No idea.  I don't have Mark's patch in the patch system.

> The patch "ARM: amba: adapt to regulator probe deferral change" from
> me could be ignored now.

But I do have yours in there.  And what do I do with your other patch
in there touching this same area as well?

Please, sort it out between you and once the patch system is right, let
me know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/