lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:47:02 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:31:30AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 03:49:45PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > I believe this patch fixes the amba probe failure that impacts any > > > AMBA platform build with CONFIG_REGULATOR enabled. Could you consider > > > to send the fix for -rc soon? > > > No idea. I don't have Mark's patch in the patch system. > > It's there as far as I can tell - it's 7366/1, which is visible in the > web interface at: > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7366/1 > > Is there something else I need to do? Ok, I thought 7366/1 and 7367/1 were part of the same looking at just the index. In any case, what would really help is if people would discard patches they no longer want applying. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists