lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334048925.7524.21.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:08:45 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: convince RT_GROUP_SCHED
 throttle to work

On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 11:54 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> With this patch, the thing appears to work perfectly, but it doesn't
> look correct, since I'm futzing with ->rt_time where I should not.

s/doesn't look/definitely isn't.  This failed the "definitely works so
may live on despite horrific appearance" test anyway, so how about just
stop pretending root isn't global instead?

sched,rt: fix isolated CPUs leaving root_task_group indefinitely throttled

Root task group bandwidth replenishment must service all CPUs regardless of
where it was last started.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -782,6 +782,19 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(stru
 	const struct cpumask *span;
 
 	span = sched_rt_period_mask();
+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: isolated CPUs should really leave the root task group,
+	 * whether they are isolcpus or were isolated via cpusets, lest
+	 * the timer run on a CPU which does not service all runqueues,
+	 * potentially leaving other CPUs indefinitely throttled.  If
+	 * isolation is really required, the user will turn the throttle
+	 * off to kill the perturbations it causes anyway.  Meanwhile,
+	 * this maintains functionality for boot and/or troubleshooting.
+	 */
+	if (rt_b == &root_task_group.rt_bandwidth)
+		span = cpu_online_mask;
+#endif
 	for_each_cpu(i, span) {
 		int enqueue = 0;
 		struct rt_rq *rt_rq = sched_rt_period_rt_rq(rt_b, i);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ