[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120410103154.GB22721@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:31:54 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 4/5/2012 2:53 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > This patch doesn't update all cpuidle device registrations. I will do that
>
> question is if you want to do per cpu latencies, or if you want to have
> both types of C state in one big table, and have each of the tegra cpyu
> types pick half of them...
>
How would the governor then know which C states belong to which CPUs?
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists