[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120410112459.GA28825@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:25:00 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: orphan queued skbs if device tx can stall
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:04:19PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 12:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > True. Still this is the only interface we have for controlling
> > the internal queue length so it seems safe to assume someone
> > is using it for this purpose.
> >
>
> So to workaround a problem in tun, you want to hack net/core/dev.c :(
Sorry about being unclear, I'm just saying that your patch assumes
tx_queue_len == 0 since you set it that way at device init but we can't
rely on this as existing users might have changed that value.
One way to fix would be a patch at the bottom: then we
can leave tun to treat tx_queue_len like it always did.
> Packets in qdisc should not be orphaned.
>
> If you think about it, why do we attach skb to socket in the first
> place ?
Good point. The answer is to avoid skb drops for local sockets by
stopping them, right?
> If its not needed for tun, why should it be needed for other devices ?
Maybe needed but it's already broken for tun since the skbs in the
private queue are orphaned by skb_orphan_try?
> If TUN has a problem being stopped forever, maybe it should take
> appropriate action to flush all packets in qdisc queue after a while, as
> this makes no sense to delay packets forever.
>
Well arbitrary timers aren't a solid protection, right?
We get out of stalling transmitters forever but a bad VM can still
degrade performance significantly for others...
----
We don't want a queue for tun since it can stall forever, but userspace
might tweak it's tx_queue_len as a way to control RX queue depth,
and we don't want to break userspace. Use a private flag to disable queue.
Warning: untested.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 27883d1..644ca53 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -695,7 +692,7 @@ static void attach_one_default_qdisc(struct net_device *dev,
{
struct Qdisc *qdisc = &noqueue_qdisc;
- if (dev->tx_queue_len) {
+ if (dev->tx_queue_len && !(dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_CAN_STALL)) {
qdisc = qdisc_create_dflt(dev_queue,
&pfifo_fast_ops, TC_H_ROOT);
if (!qdisc) {
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists