linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86, intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120410144235.1e05efd4@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:42:35 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86, intel_mid: ADC management

> Right, but fundamentally it's just a general purpose ADC which looks
> just the same as all the other SoC/PMIC ADCs.  Like I say the decision
> for that hardware was to push it in via IIO. 

Your decision maybe. And it's one that makes no sense.

As I said this is a low level interface for driver enabling including
early boot time stuff, and its on a platform that's unlikely to want or
ever use and suck in the big blob of IIO code.

If you want an IIO interface to it you can write one, it's just a low
level resource manager.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/