[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120410141041.GA19556@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:10:41 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: orphan queued skbs if device tx can stall
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:52:09PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 15:41 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > I think it's a bad interface too but it's in a userspace ABI
> > now so I suspect we are stuck with it for now. We can try deprecating
> > but we can't just drop it.
> >
>
> By the way, skb orphaning should already be done in skb_orphan_try(),
> not sure why its done again in tun_net_xmit().
I think it's for when some tx flags are set.
> Note we perform orphaning right before giving skb to device on premise
> it'll be sent (and freed) in a reasonable amount of time.
Right. No way to ensure this with tun :(
> With following patch, no more qdisc on top of tun device,
I'll test this, thanks.
> yet user can
> change the limit
Question: if tun is moved between namespaces after tx queue len
is changed, will it get a queueing qdisc then?
If yes we need some other hack to address that ...
> (I would be curious to know if anybody changes tun
> txqueuelen and why)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index bb8c72c..c4a00cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static int tun_net_close(struct net_device *dev)
> static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev);
> + int limit;
>
> tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_net_xmit %d\n", skb->len);
>
> @@ -396,7 +397,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> sk_filter(tun->socket.sk, skb))
> goto drop;
>
> - if (skb_queue_len(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue) >= dev->tx_queue_len) {
> + limit = dev->tx_queue_len ? : TUN_READQ_SIZE;
> + if (skb_queue_len(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue) >= limit) {
> if (!(tun->flags & TUN_ONE_QUEUE)) {
> /* Normal queueing mode. */
> /* Packet scheduler handles dropping of further packets. */
> @@ -521,7 +523,7 @@ static void tun_net_init(struct net_device *dev)
> /* Zero header length */
> dev->type = ARPHRD_NONE;
> dev->flags = IFF_POINTOPOINT | IFF_NOARP | IFF_MULTICAST;
> - dev->tx_queue_len = TUN_READQ_SIZE; /* We prefer our own queue length */
> + dev->tx_queue_len = 0;
> break;
>
> case TUN_TAP_DEV:
> @@ -532,7 +534,7 @@ static void tun_net_init(struct net_device *dev)
>
> eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
>
> - dev->tx_queue_len = TUN_READQ_SIZE; /* We prefer our own queue length */
> + dev->tx_queue_len = 0;
> break;
> }
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists