[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+K6fF5TbhYX_XYXL33h5s8cnSogSna4Cq2-vM4MfX4igSyozg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:19:56 -0700
From: Sandeep Patil <psandeep.s@...il.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv24 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator
>>
>> This is (yet another) update of CMA patches.
>
>
> How well CMA is supposed to work if you have mlocked processes? I've
> been testing these patches, and noticed that by creating a small mlocked
> process you start to get plenty of test_pages_isolated() failure warnings,
> and bigger allocations will always fail.
CMIIW, I think mlocked pages are never migrated. The reason is because
__isolate_lru_pages() does not isolate Unevictable pages right now.
Minchan added support to allow this but the patch was dropped.
See the discussion at : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/29/295
Sandeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists