[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334079411.23924.221.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:36:51 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] parse-events: Fix printk_cmp()
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:54 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The printk_cmp function should use printk_map instead of func_map.
> Also rename the variables for consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
> ---
> parse-events.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/parse-events.c b/parse-events.c
> index 5214771..f90af1a 100644
> --- a/parse-events.c
> +++ b/parse-events.c
> @@ -507,12 +507,12 @@ struct printk_list {
>
> static int printk_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> {
> - const struct func_map *fa = a;
> - const struct func_map *fb = b;
> + const struct printk_map *pa = a;
> + const struct printk_map *pb = b;
>
> - if (fa->addr < fb->addr)
> + if (pa->addr < pb->addr)
> return -1;
> - if (fa->addr > fb->addr)
> + if (pa->addr > pb->addr)
Ouch! This worked only because the first item in both func_map and
printk_map happened to be addr (of the same size).
-- Steve
> return 1;
>
> return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists