[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120410114329.138fe242.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:43:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: correctly synchronize rss-counters at exit/exec
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:07:32 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> mm->rss_stat counters have per-task delta: task->rss_stat, before changing
> task->mm pointer kernel must flush this delta with help of sync_mm_rss().
>
> do_exit() already calls sync_mm_rss() to flush rss-counters before commiting
> rss-statistics into task->signal->maxrss, taskstats, audit and other stuff.
> Unfortunately kernel do this before calling mm_relese(), which can call put_user()
> for processing task->clear_child_tid. So at this point we can trigger page-faults
> and task->rss_stat becomes non-zero again, as result mm->rss_stat becomes
> inconsistent and check_mm() will print something like this:
>
> | BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff88020813c380 idx:1 val:-1
> | BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff88020813c380 idx:2 val:1
>
> This patch moves sync_mm_rss() into mm_release(), and moves mm_release() out of
> do_exit() and calls it earlier. After mm_release() there should be no page-faults.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -751,6 +751,14 @@ void mm_release(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
> }
> tsk->clear_child_tid = NULL;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Final rss-counter synchronization. After this point must be
> + * no page-faults into this mm from current context, otherwise
> + * mm->rss_stat will be inconsistent.
> + */
> + if (mm)
> + sync_mm_rss(mm);
> }
>
Well that's scary. AFACIT `mm' can indeed be NULL here, when a kernel
thread calls do_exit(). No implementation of deactivate_mm() actually
uses its `mm' arg and I guess that kernel threads never set
tsk->clear_child_tid. Whee.
Do we think we should backport this into -stable kernels? How hard is
it to make that warning come out?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists