lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120410031904.GA17300@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:19:04 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	konrad.r.wilk@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Convert wake_sleep_flags to a value instead of
 function (v2)

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50:26AM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 22:34 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > With commit a2ef5c4fd44ce3922435139393b89f2cce47f576
> > "ACPI: Move module parameter gts and bfs to sleep.c" the wake_sleep_flags
> > is required when calling acpi_enter_sleep_state, which means
> > that if there are functions outside the sleep.c code they
> > can't get get the wake_sleep_flags values.
> > 
> > This converts the function in to a exported value and converts
> > the module config operands to a function.
> > 
> > [v2: Parameters can be turned on/off dynamically]
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h |    2 +
> >  drivers/acpi/sleep.c         |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
> > index 4d3feb5..7bab5fb 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ extern long saved_magic;
> >  
> >  extern int wakeup_pmode_return;
> >  
> > +extern unsigned char wake_sleep_flags;
> > +
> 
> Could you use "u8" same as the definition below?

Yes. Thx for spotting that.

> 
> Others look good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>

Great! Thanks.

> 
> Thanks,
> Lin Ming
> 
> >  extern unsigned long acpi_copy_wakeup_routine(unsigned long);
> >  extern void wakeup_long64(void);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > index 6a8d4d3..86bf909 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > @@ -28,23 +28,33 @@
> >  #include "internal.h"
> >  #include "sleep.h"
> >  
> > +u8 wake_sleep_flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
> >  static unsigned int gts, bfs;
> > -module_param(gts, uint, 0644);
> > -module_param(bfs, uint, 0644);
> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> > -
> > -static u8 wake_sleep_flags(void)
> > +static int set_param_wake_flag(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
> >  {
> > -	u8 flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
> > +	int ret = param_set_int(val, kp);
> >  
> > -	if (gts)
> > -		flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
> > -	if (bfs)
> > -		flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> >  
> > -	return flags;
> > +	if (val == (const char *)&gts) {
> > +		if (gts)
> > +			wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
> > +		else
> > +			wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
> > +	}
> > +	if (val == (const char *)&bfs) {
> > +		if (bfs)
> > +			wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
> > +		else
> > +			wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
> > +	}
> > +	return ret;
> >  }
> > +module_param_call(gts, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &gts, 0644);
> > +module_param_call(bfs, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &bfs, 0644);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> >  
> >  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> >  
> > @@ -263,7 +273,6 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> >  {
> >  	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> >  	u32 acpi_state = acpi_target_sleep_state;
> > -	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> >  	int error;
> >  
> >  	ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
> > @@ -271,7 +280,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> >  	switch (acpi_state) {
> >  	case ACPI_STATE_S1:
> >  		barrier();
> > -		status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, flags);
> > +		status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
> >  		break;
> >  
> >  	case ACPI_STATE_S3:
> > @@ -288,7 +297,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> >  	acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_SCI_ENABLE, 1);
> >  
> >  	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
> > -	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, flags);
> > +	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
> >  
> >  	/* ACPI 3.0 specs (P62) says that it's the responsibility
> >  	 * of the OSPM to clear the status bit [ implying that the
> > @@ -552,30 +561,27 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_begin(void)
> >  
> >  static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
> >  {
> > -	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> >  	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> >  
> >  	ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
> >  
> >  	/* This shouldn't return.  If it returns, we have a problem */
> > -	status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
> > +	status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
> >  	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
> > -	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
> > +	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
> >  
> >  	return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
> >  {
> > -	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If ACPI is not enabled by the BIOS and the boot kernel, we need to
> >  	 * enable it here.
> >  	 */
> >  	acpi_enable();
> >  	/* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
> > -	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
> > +	acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
> >  	/* Check the hardware signature */
> >  	if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
> >  		printk(KERN_EMERG "ACPI: Hardware changed while hibernated, "
> > @@ -830,12 +836,10 @@ static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
> >  
> >  static void acpi_power_off(void)
> >  {
> > -	u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> > -
> >  	/* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */
> >  	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s called\n", __func__);
> >  	local_irq_disable();
> > -	acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, flags);
> > +	acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, wake_sleep_flags);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ