[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F854B9C.3000405@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:15:08 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] KVM: MMU: fast page fault
On 04/11/2012 04:47 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:04:13PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/09/2012 10:46 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Perhaps the mmu_lock hold times by get_dirty are a large component here?
> >
> > That's my concern, because it affects the scaling of migration for wider
> > guests.
> >
> > > If that can be alleviated, not only RO->RW faults benefit.
> >
> > Those are the most common types of faults on modern hardware, no?
>
> Depends on your workload, of course. If there is memory pressure,
> 0->PRESENT might be very frequent. My point is that reduction of
> mmu_lock contention is a good thing overall.
>
Agreed.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists