linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 0/3] do not use s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1334144707-9729-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:45:04 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] do not use s_dirt in FAT FS

The FAT file-system uses the VFS '->write_super()' method for writing out
the FSINFO block, which contains useful but not critical information like
the amount of free clusters.

This patch-set makes FAT FS use its own mechanisms for writing-out the FSINFO
block and stop using the '->write_super()' VFS method. Namely, the FAT FS now
submits a delayed work for writing out the FSINFO block once it becomes dirty.

The reason of this exercises is to get rid of the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread.
This kernel thread wakes up every 5 (by default) and calls '->write_super()'
for all mounted file-systems. And the bad thing is that this is done even if
all the superblocks are clean. Moreover, some file-systems do not even need this
end they do not register the '->write_super()' method at all (e.g., btrfs).

So 'sync_supers()' most often just generates useless wake-ups and wastes
power. I am trying to make all file-systems independent of '->write_super()'
and plan to remove 'sync_supers()' and '->write_super' completely once there
are no more users.

Tested with xfstests.

Note: in the past I was trying to upstream patches which optimized 'sync_super()',
but Al Viro wanted me to kill it completely instead, which I am trying to do now.

======
Overall status:

1. ext4: patches submitted, waiting for reply from Ted Ts'o:
   https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/2/111
2. ext2: patches are in the ext2 tree maintained by Jan Kara:
   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git for_next
   However, one patch is still not there:
   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg31492.html

TODO: affs, exofs, hfs, hfsplus, jffs2, reiserfs, sysv, udf, ufs
======

Thanks,
Artem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/