linux-kernel - Re: dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.38->3.0+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120411182822.GD16008@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:28:22 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Cc:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.38->3.0+

On Wed 11-04-12 12:19:43, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 04:40 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > On 10.04.2012 19:13, Jan Kara wrote:
> >> > On Tue 10-04-12 10:00:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > []
> >>> >>   2.6.38:
> >>> >>   # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct count=100
> >>> >>   100+0 records in
> >>> >>   100+0 records out
> >>> >>   104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.73126 s, 60.6 MB/s
> >>> >>
> >>> >>   3.0:
> >>> >>   # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct count=100
> >>> >>   100+0 records in
> >>> >>   100+0 records out
> >>> >>   104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 29.4508 s, 3.6 MB/s
> >>> >>
> >>> >> That's about 20 times difference on direct read from the
> >>> >> same - idle - device!!
> >> >   Huh, that's a huge difference for such a trivial load. So we can rule out
> >> > filesystems, writeback, mm. I also wouldn't think it's IO scheduler but
> >> > you can always check by comparing dd numbers after
> >> >   echo none >/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
> 
> Did you try newer 3.X kernels or just 3.0?
> 
> We were hitting a similar problem with iscsi. Same workload and it
> started with 2.6.38. I think it turned out to be this issue:
> 
> // thread with issue like what we hit:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1244680
> 
> // Patch that I think fixed issue:
> commit 3deaa7190a8da38453c4fabd9dec7f66d17fff67
> Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> Date:   Fri Feb 3 15:37:17 2012 -0800
> 
>     readahead: fix pipeline break caused by block plug
  I already asked about this but that doesn't seem to be the cause.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/