linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHGf_=ro=TwrYw4UoUMaHjb08rVbz-KjovZfND608J26w=n4HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:10 -0400
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	drepper@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 05:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>> I know the reason. fcntl(F_NEXT) is one of a proposal of next SUS enhancement.
>>
>>   http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=149
>>
>> nextfd() has a semantics of F_NEXT.
>>
>
> Looking at that bug report, it sounds like that proposal was rejected.

?

If I understand correctly, above URL says, latest satatus is

  Resolution: Accepted As Marked

Please see toppest issue summary. Or if I am missing something, can you please
point out which line are you seeing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/