[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120411231025.387614571@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:11:00 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: [ 42/78] PM / Runtime: dont forget to wake up waitqueue on failure
3.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
commit f2791d733a2f06997b573d1a3cfde21e6f529826 upstream.
This patch (as1535) fixes a bug in the runtime PM core. When a
runtime suspend attempt completes, whether successfully or not, the
device's power.wait_queue is supposed to be signalled. But this
doesn't happen in the failure pathway of rpm_suspend() when another
autosuspend attempt is rescheduled. As a result, a task can get stuck
indefinitely on the wait queue (I have seen this happen in testing).
The patch fixes the problem by moving the wake_up_all() call up near
the start of the failure code.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *de
dev->power.suspend_time = ktime_set(0, 0);
dev->power.max_time_suspended_ns = -1;
dev->power.deferred_resume = false;
+ wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
+
if (retval == -EAGAIN || retval == -EBUSY) {
dev->power.runtime_error = 0;
@@ -547,7 +549,6 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *de
} else {
pm_runtime_cancel_pending(dev);
}
- wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
goto out;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists