[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120410233731.7169c2e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:37:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:33:15 +0200 Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> wrote:
> I don't want to use a "veto" about this patch. If nobody see problem
> to apply it, then even ok for me. As I said I'm guessing possible
> situations where an unload features is useful.
>
> Andrew what do you think?
Yes, I plan to send it to Linus.
breaking unloading is a regression, albeit a small one. It's a bit
sad that nobody appears to intend to fix it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists