linux-kernel - Re: + syscalls-x86-add-__nr_kcmp-syscall-v8.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120411063957.GA11629@moon>
Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:39:57 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: + syscalls-x86-add-__nr_kcmp-syscall-v8.patch added to -mm tree

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:42:06AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > On 04/10/2012 04:08 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, since this is discussed again...
> > >
> > > Can this comment can also explain why do we obfuscate the pointers
> > > by type? I mean, I don't really understand why the one-dimensional
> > > cookies[2] is "not enough" from security pov.
> >
> > Because it's cheap.  "Just enough" is not what you want to shoot for,
> > ever, you want to get past the "just enough" point and then consider
> > "what can I get for cheap at this point"?
> 
> OK, I am not arguing. Just I thought that the small note like
> "we are doing this per-type to obfuscate even more" can help.
> I wouldn't have asked, but Cyrill rewrites this comment anyway.
> 
> Perhaps this is just me, but my first (and wrong) impression was
> that somehow this is needed for correctness.

Hi Oleg, would the form below sounds good?

---
Subject: Add a comment on kcmp obfuscation method

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
---
 kernel/kcmp.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6.git/kernel/kcmp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/kernel/kcmp.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/kcmp.c
@@ -17,6 +17,20 @@
  * reasons, still the comparison results should be suitable for
  * sorting. Thus, we obfuscate kernel pointers values and compare
  * the production instead.
+ *
+ * The obfuscation is done in two steps. First -- we use xor on
+ * kernel pointer with random value, which puts pointer into
+ * a new position in reordered space. Second -- we multiply
+ * the xor production with big odd random number to permute
+ * bits even more (the odd multiplier guarantees that the product
+ * is unique ever after the high bits are truncated, since any odd
+ * number is relative prime to 2^n).
+ *
+ * The obfuscation is done with per-type cookie values to increase
+ * initial entropy of results.
+ *
+ * Note also the obfuscation itself is invisible to user-space
+ * and if needed it can be changed to any suitable scheme.
  */
 static unsigned long cookies[KCMP_TYPES][2] __read_mostly;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/