[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP13zqFMTsndaW3YVZEA=aKMGsG-nO+i8k9frmSAzUNyrzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:27:55 +0200
From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:08, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:16:22PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>> I guess the following:
>> - remove the 'ptmx' cdev from drivers/tty/pty.c
>> - add a new devtmpfs_create_link() to drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
>> - call devtmpfs_create_link() from _init in fs/devpts/inode.c
>> - change the default of ptxmode=0 to a sane default = 0666
>> - get rid of the (rather broken) idea of 'legacy' vs 'non-legacy mode'
>> mount options in the default setup; I don't think userspace should
>> ever be required to fiddle with such stuff
>
> You do realize that there are people with _static_ /dev out there, don't
> you? As well as those of us who are not using your latest and greatest
> udev and not enabling devtmpfs at all. Not all world is Fedora...
Yeah, and? The dev_t still works from the static /dev/ like it didi 10
years ago. All good.
Not all breaks when I talk about it. :)
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists