lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120412121124.64aee2f6@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:11:24 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	drepper@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:54:25 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:02 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> > On 04/06/2012 01:16 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >>
> >> closefrom(3) written via nextfd(2) loop is reliable and doesn't fail.
> >> closefrom(3) written via /proc/self/fd is reliable and can fail (including ENOMEM).
> >> closefrom(3) written via close(fd++) is unreliable.
> >>
> >
> > I call shenanigans on this.  There is no reason to ENOMEM on the second
> > written using the fdwalk() implementation I already posted, for example.
> 
> open("/proc/self/fd") can fail with ENOMEM.

Any syscall can fail with a process kill due to a stack extend on out of
memory in most configurations. That includes your nextfd stuff

This whole thing is getting stupid. "Perfection is the enemy of
success".

Your code will also fail when the cat pees on the computer, when the
power fails and when disk dies. I suspect that other than the cat these
are all more likely real world cases than your ENOMEM.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ