[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120412114955.GI20431@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:49:55 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: dont clear TMR on EOI
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:03:18PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:49:55PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Intel spec says that TMR needs to be set/cleared
> > when IRR is set, but kvm also clears it on EOI.
> >
> > I did some tests on a real (AMD based) system,
> > and I see same TMR values both before
> > and after EOI, so I think it's a minor bug in kvm.
> >
> > This patch fixes TMR to be set/cleared on IRR set
> > only as per spec.
> >
> > And now that we don't clear TMR, we can save
> > an atomic read of TMR on EOI that's not propagated
> > to ioapic, by checking whether ioapic needs
> > a specific vector first and calculating
> > the mode afterwards.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 10 +++++++---
> > virt/kvm/ioapic.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Looks OK, ioapic_service -> accept_apic_irq will set TMR
> again if IRR is raised. Gleb, can you review please?
>
Looks good to me.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists