[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F86D241.1030609@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:01:53 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Prashanth Nageshappa <prashanth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/probe: verify instruction/offset in perf before
adding a uprobe
(2012/04/12 18:29), Prashanth Nageshappa wrote:
> To verify instruction/offset in perf, before adding a uprobe we
> need to use arc/x86/lib/insn.c from perf code. Since perf Makefile
> enables -Wswitch-default flag it causes build warnings/failures. This
> patch is to address the build warnings in insn.c.
Hmm, I see the reason why we need this. However, I think it should have
more correct error checking... I'll try that.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists