[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120412170924.GA18049@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:09:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rajendra.nayak@...aro.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: implement pinctrl deferred probing
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> If drivers try to obtain pinctrl handles for a pin controller that
> has not yet registered to the subsystem, we need to be able to
> back out and retry with deferred probing. So let's return
> -EPROBE_DEFER whenever this location fails. Also downgrade the
> errors to info, maybe we will even set them to debug once the
> deferred probing is commonplace.
Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Note that the probe deferral code already has info level logs every time
it does anything so you'll probably have a hint from that when it kicks
into action.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists