[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120412123147.1ac34ae0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:31:47 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] proc: use IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > (4/12/12 9:23 AM), Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > - if (mm&& !IS_ERR(mm)) {
> > > > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm)) {
> > >
> > > I personally find original code way more readable.
> >
> > personally, me too. but new one is also acceptable to me.
>
> That now makes 4 votes that it's not an improvement, with no dissent
> (unless akpm's + proc-use-is_err_or_null.patch added to -mm tree
> should be counted as dissent): let's drop this patch.
I think it's OK. IS_ERR_OR_NULL encapsulates the concept "something
went wrong".
Not that I'm particularly passionate about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists