[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120412203220.GA27629@mail.gnudd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:32:20 +0200
From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
giancarlo.asnaghi@...com, alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86: introduce CONFIG_X86_DEV_DMA_OPS
>> config MAX_DMA_PADDR
>> int
>> default 536870912 if MAX_DMA_PADDR_512M
>> default 16777216
>>
>> config MAX_DMA_PADDR_512M
>> bool
>>
>> (actually, we'd benefit from being able to use hex in defaults)
>>
>> Is this worth exploring, to possibly submit a patch in this direction?
>>
>
> Not as a compile-time patch.
Why not? CONFIG_ISA is a compile-time choice. I thought that if you
compile for non-ISA systems you may reuse the zone mechanism with a
different split.
But if not a compile-time thing, would you accept it at run time?
I feel it's not a beautiful approach, because it must clearly be
masked by #ifndef CONFIG_ISA or such. Worse, you must know the zone
split at the beginning, before you scan the PCI bus and find your
devices.
thanks
/alessandro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists