[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyLEJsz1yvu4bYe+RHdhLd-XXEScxtAgje=fyuUM+1XxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:34:10 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sergio Correia <lists@...e.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@....qualcomm.com>,
"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I could argue in favor of exceptions, but I don't think you realize
> the fact that this change does not affect your tree *at all*. Adding
> and removing a patch in the stable tree is a no-op.
You're a fucking moron.
It's not a no-op at all, and you don't seem to understand it.
It's *information*.
It's "that patch didn't work". That's not a no-op. That's actual
useful and worthwhile knowledge.
To quote Thomas Edison: "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000
ways that won't work."
So just reverting it from stable, *WITHOUT LEARNING THE LESSON*, is
not a no-op at all, it's a sign of being a f*cking moron.
I'm stupider for just reading your email. Go away.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists