[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204130022520.2542@ionos>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:26:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Sasikantha Babu <sasikanth.v19@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] timer fixes for 3.4
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > The itimer removal one is not strictly a fix, but I really wanted to
> > avoid a rebase of the urgent ones.
>
> Btw, I think that setitimer NULL pointer removal commit is crap.
>
> If people actually do rely on the NULL pointer thing, we're not
> "scheduling it for removal". And we most *definitely* aren't
> scheduling it for removal for some short timeframe like 3.6.
>
> That's not how ABI's work. If it has become something people rely on,
> it now *is* part of the ABI, and no amount of "violates the spec"
> matters what-so-ever.
>
> "The spec" is paper - and worthless. What people actually *do* is all
> that matters.
I ran it through all the various (outdated) distros I have handy and
the printk didn't show once.
I tried to figure out the reason for this NULL pointer thing, but
there is no trace of it on the intarwebs at all.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists