[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413125405.GA5952@beyadr.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:54:05 +0300
From: Hannu Heikkinen <hannuxx@....fi>
To: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>
Cc: "rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: tegra: cleanup probe/remove routines
On 13/04/12 11:05 +0530, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> > + if (info->tegra_rtc_irq <= 0)
> > + return -EBUSY;
> Interrupt support is needed only for wake up or timer support.
> Apart from them RTC can be used for reference time keeping.
>
> So, is it not good to print a warn message as "wake up
> with alarm is not supported" and proceed further instead of
> returning failure from the driver itself?
I propose that this patch would go in as is, as this is mainly for adjusting
probe/remove routines for using devm_* funcs, and to leave that above issue
you mentioned to another patch, as it would be a change to current behavior.
br,
Hannu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists