[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413182051.GA11149@sergelap>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:20:51 -0500
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidns: reboot_pid_ns: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of
force_sig()
Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com):
> cf3f8921 "pidns: add reboot_pid_ns() to handle the reboot syscall"
> uses force_sig() to kill the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE cinit, this was the
> only choice.
>
> After 629d362b we can use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead, force_sig() has
> the special semantics and should be avoided if possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Hi Oleg,
I like the patch in theory, however after applying it containers are
no longer able to shutdown/reboot. I can externally kill them with
lxc-stop, but internal shutdown fails.
> diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> index 57bc1fd..ef35e20 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ int reboot_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int cmd)
> }
>
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> - force_sig(SIGKILL, pid_ns->child_reaper);
> + do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, pid_ns->child_reaper, true);
> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>
> do_exit(0);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists