[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413203205.GI26383@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:32:05 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:11:31PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With the previous change to guarantee bypass visiblity for RCU read
> lock regions, entering bypass mode involves non-trivial overhead and
> future changes are scheduled to make use of bypass mode during init
> path. Combined it may end up adding noticeable delay during boot.
>
> This patch makes request_queue start its life in bypass mode, which is
> ended on queue init completion at the end of
> blk_init_allocated_queue(), and updates blk_queue_bypass_start() such
> that draining and RCU synchronization are performed only when the
> queue actually enters bypass mode.
>
> This avoids unnecessarily switching in and out of bypass mode during
> init avoiding the overhead and any nasty surprises which may step from
> leaving bypass mode on half-initialized queues.
Tejun, I am not sure that this will fix the problem completely. I think
we will still face the overhead of synchronize_rcu() in
blkcg_deactivate_policy() as it will be called from cfq_exit_queue() for
initialized queues.
In the past I had I had used synchronize_rcu() in cfq_exit_queue() and
noticed the overhead. Looks like driver was creating fully initialized
queues and tearing these apart soon.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists