[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413204710.GF12233@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:47:10 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:44:46PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:37:26PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> [..]
> > blk_cleanup_queue() doesn't use blk_queue_bypass_start() to enter
> > bypass mode.
>
> Oh now elevator_exit() has been moved into blk_release_queue(). But
> problem will still be there, isn't it? During driver init, most likely driver
> is holding last reference of the queue and blk_release_queue() will be called
> in the context of blk_cleanup_queue() causing the overhead?
Hmmm? blk_cleanup_queue() will put the queue into bypassing mode
without going through synchronize_rcu() and all the following
bypassing operations just inc/decs bypass_depth without any draining
operation.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists