linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/13] clk: core: correct clk_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJOA=zMHGO6N2q=StogU3envVBt23o-2Od70gtdRkQG_Ku7=CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:23:16 -0700
From:	"Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Cc:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
	"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"arnd.bergmann@...aro.org" <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] clk: core: correct clk_set_rate kerneldoc

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com> wrote:
> On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> - * If clk has the CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag set and it is enabled this call
>> - * will fail; only when the clk is disabled will it be able to change
>> - * its rate.
>
> Why is CLK_SET_RATE_GATE removed? I already sent a patch to fix clk_set_rate()
> for this. And i think it should be required.

I removed it from the documentation since it was not present in the
code.  I was originally targeting this for an -rc and I was trying to
limit the changes purely to fixes and cleanups, not new features.

I haven't finished digging through all of the responses yet, so my
goal for where these patches are headed might change.

Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/