[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1204140052450.13233@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:53:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpi: Avoid using freed pointer in mpi_lshift_limbs()
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ping?
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> At the start of the function we assign 'a->d' to 'ap'. Then we use the
> >> >> RESIZE_IF_NEEDED macro on 'a' - this may free 'a->d' and replace it
> >> >> with newly allocaetd storage. In that case, we'll be operating on
> >> >> freed memory further down in the function when we index into 'ap[]'.
> >> >> Since we don't actually need 'ap' until after the use of the
> >> >> RESIZE_IF_NEEDED macro we can just delay the assignment to it until
> >> >> after we've potentially resized, thus avoiding the issue.
> >> >>
> >> >> While I was there anyway I also changed the integer variable 'n' to be
> >> >> const. It might as well be since we only assign to it once and use it
> >> >> as a constant, and then the compiler will tell us if we ever assign to
> >> >> it in the future.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c | 5 +++--
> >> >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> only compile tested.
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c b/lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c
> >> >> index 2f52662..0c50536 100644
> >> >> --- a/lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c
> >> >> +++ b/lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c
> >> >> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ int mpi_rshift(MPI x, MPI a, unsigned n)
> >> >> */
> >> >> int mpi_lshift_limbs(MPI a, unsigned int count)
> >> >> {
> >> >> - mpi_ptr_t ap = a->d;
> >> >> - int n = a->nlimbs;
> >> >> + const int n = a->nlimbs;
> >> >> + mpi_ptr_t ap;
> >> >> int i;
> >> >>
> >> >> if (!count || !n)
> >> >> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ int mpi_lshift_limbs(MPI a, unsigned int count)
> >> >> if (RESIZE_IF_NEEDED(a, n + count) < 0)
> >> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> >>
> >> >> + ap = a->d;
> >> >> for (i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> >> >> ap[i + count] = ap[i];
> >> >> for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
> >> > Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> >> > Plain text mails only, please.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was travelling last week.
> >> I will review the patch now..
> >>
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Did you get a chance to review the patch? Did you find it acceptable or
> > flawed?
> >
> > If it is OK, what do I need to from this point forward to get it merged?
> >
> >
>
> Hello Jesper & James,
>
> That is of course correct.
>
> James, can you please apply this patch to security fixes?
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
>
Thank you for your time to review and your ACK :-)
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists