linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] Sparc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120414105049.GA13137@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:50:49 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Sparc


* Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:13:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:46:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > With special guest sparc64 assembler hacker, Paul E. McKenney.
> > > > 
> > > > Oh christ.  You're teaching *more* people about sparc64?
> > > You do not get it...
> > > 
> > > How many people are pondering around tweaking every bit of x86
> > > specific code? A lot! Let them have fun competing :-)
> > 
> > I wish it was so! In reality there's really just a handful of 
> > people looking at actual x86 assembly code. I don't know whether 
> > I've ever seen a conflict between substantial x86 assembly 
> > patches, in the last 4 years since I co-maintain the x86 
> > architecture ...
> 
> Hmm...
> 
>       lines of c files  lines of S files
> x86   183609            27130
> sparc 66823             25852

Yes.

( I have no idea what the 'Hmm...' means - do those numbers 
  somehow contradict what I said? )

> There is more than just assembly when dealign with an architecture.

Definitely.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/