[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120414114129.GF24688@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:41:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, jolsa@...hat.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Fix parsers' rules to dependencies
* tip-bot for Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 024e6c9747bb274c9d744ad52a987a0ebec528a6
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/024e6c9747bb274c9d744ad52a987a0ebec528a6
> Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:39:51 +0200
> Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> CommitDate: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:57:09 -0300
>
> perf tools: Fix parsers' rules to dependencies
>
> Currently the parsers objects (bison/flex related) are each time perf
> is built. No matter the generated files are already in place, the
> parser generation is executed every time.
>
> Changing the rules to have proper flex/bison objects generation
> dependencies.
>
> The parsers code is not rebuilt until the flex/bison source files
> are touched. Also when flex/bison source is changed, only dependent
> objects are rebuilt.
Hm, can I cherry-pick this over into perf/urgent? I see no good
reason why we should leave the v3.4 version half-broken.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists