[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334404423.2528.75.camel@twins>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:53:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, ctalbott@...gle.com,
rni@...gle.com, andrea@...terlinux.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lsf@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jmoyer@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lsf] [RFC] writeback and cgroup
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 11:49 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > - How to handle NFS.
>
> As said above, maybe through network based bdi pressure propagation,
> Maybe some other special case mechanism. Unsure but I don't think
> this concern should dictate the whole design.
NFS has a custom bdi implementation and implements congestion control
based on the number of outstanding writeback pages.
See fs/nfs/write.c:nfs_{set,end}_page_writeback
All !block based filesystems have their own BDI implementation, I'm not
sure on the congestion implementation of anything other than NFS though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists