[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMP44s2jLv=VPgjiocmzzyUqzUYp4b7nFEU_XV6nT=n+OZ3RNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:52:00 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>,
Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sergio Correia <lists@...e.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@....qualcomm.com>,
"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> On Apr 14 Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> Of course, although the difference with the stable kernel would be
>> very small if the only thing added is an extra rule for acceptance:
>> "It reverts an earlier patch to 'stable'."
>
> It looks like a small difference on the surface, but it isn't. It would
> mean "yes, we /do/ forward ports in -stable too in some cases".
How? There's a lot reverts in mainline, where do they come from? Are
they forward ports from some ghost trees?
If you drop a patch from the stable review queue before it gets into a
stable release, and then that patch is reverted from mainline, is that
also a "forward port"?
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists