[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120414201748.GA8482@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:17:48 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] task_work_add (was: task_work_queue)
On 04/14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Can you use this to get rid of TIF_UPROBE as well?
Yes, I thought about uprobes. May be it can use task_work, but
it is not easy to avoid TIF_UPROBE. The problem is the first
UTASK_BP_HIT when current->utask == NULL, and ->utask is the
only "right" place to hold task_work. We will see.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists