linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] do not redefine userspace's NULL #define

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201204141021.28906.l.lunak@suse.cz>
Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:21:28 +0200
From:	Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@...e.cz>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@...driver.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] do not redefine userspace's NULL #define

On Saturday 14 of April 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yeah, I'm not a fan of C++. It's a cruddy language.

 Whatever. There's no need for you to waste time on lecturing me on C++, I 
know it well enough, including the pitfalls. And I especially know well about 
C++'s NULL, I got enough theoretical lectures from gcc people while making 
them not bury warnings about incorrect NULL usage in the rather 
useless -Wconversion. The reality is what it is regardless of how much you or 
I like it.

 How about the patch? Are there any *actual* problems with it or can it please 
go in?

-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 l.lunak@...e.cz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/