[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8A3D5C.8030001@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:15:40 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
CC: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] dt: add of_get_child_count helper function
On 04/13/2012 01:07 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 02/11/2012 11:22 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>>> Currently most code to get child count in kernel are almost same,
>>> add a helper to implement this function for dt to use.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Since my imx pinctrl driver series still depends on the pinctrl core dt
>>> binding patch which is still not in mainline, i'd like this pure dt patch
>>> go separately first in case others want to use.
>>>
>>
>> Applied for 3.4.
>>
> I did not see this in 3.4 kernel.
> Anything i missed?
> My pinctrl-imx driver i just sent is using this.
Sorry, I did not get this sent to Grant in time. Go ahead and merge it
with your pinctrl driver.
Rob
>
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
>
>> Rob
>>
>>> changes v2->v3:
>>> Addressed some people's comments:
>>> * do not use assignment as expression
>>> * return 0 for non-dt case
>>>
>>> Changes v1->v2:
>>> * change the name from of_get_child_number to of_get_child_count
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/of.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>>> index a75a831..ae242ef 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>>> @@ -195,6 +195,17 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
>>> for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>>> child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>>>
>>> +static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *child = NULL;
>>> + int num = 0;
>>> +
>>> + while ((child = of_get_next_child(np, child)) != NULL)
>>> + num++;
>>> +
>>> + return num;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>>> struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
>>> #define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>>> @@ -268,6 +279,11 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
>>> #define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>>> while (0)
>>>
>>> +static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device,
>>> const char *name)
>>> {
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists