linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add 'G' and 'H' modifiers to event parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:23:00 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	acme@...stprotocols.net, mingo@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add 'G' and 'H' modifiers to event parsing

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 17:59 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > -modifier_event [ukhp]{1,5}
> > +modifier_event [ukhpGH]{1,5} 
> 
> You'd also need to increase the 5 to 7 I think, unless there's a clear
> exclusion with some of the other flags.
> 
> Hmm, as it stands I think the 5 is already too low: "ukhppp" is 6.
> 
> We should really write this as ['u'] ['k'] ['h'] ['G'] ['H'] ['p'{1,3}],
> not the combined thing.
If we will write them like that they all will have to be present for
successful match of modifier_event, no?

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/