linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio_balloon: Bugfixes for PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120415085202.GA20414@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:52:04 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio_balloon: Bugfixes for PAGE_SIZE != 4k

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:12:11PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:14:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:36:35PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> [snip]
> > Good catch!
> > 
> > Unfortunately I find the approach a bit convoluted.
> > It also looks like when host asks for 5 balloon pages
> > you interpret this as 0 where 16 is probably saner
> > on a 64K system.
> 
> Hm, true.  Although qemu at least actuall operates in units of
> megabytes on the balloon, so I doubt it matters much in practice.
> 
> > I think it's easier if we just keep doing math in
> > balloon pages. I also get confused by shift operations,
> > IMO / and * are clearer where they are applicable.
> > Something like the below would make more sense I think.
> 
> Sure.  I thught working in local pages was clearer, but I don't really
> care.
> 
> 
> > I also wrote up a detailed commit log, so we have
> > the bugs and the expected consequences listed explicitly.
> > 
> > I'm out of time for this week - so completely untested, sorry.
> > Maybe you could try this out? That would be great.
> > Thanks!
> 
> Your patch has numerous syntax errors, but once those are fixed seems
> to work fine with a 64k ppc64 kernel.  Fixed version below.  I did add
> one comment, to note that with this change the num_pages field in the
> vb is no longer the same as the number of elements in the pages list.
> Nothing in the code relies on that, but it would probably be the first
> assumption of someone looking at the structure definition.

Good point. Although this really applies to all other
memory counters as well, so I put this at top of the file.

> Please apply.

Patch applied, thanks very much for the testing!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/