linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:08:55 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast()

On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 00:21 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> +int __weak is_swbp_at_addr_fast(unsigned long vaddr)
> +{
> +       uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
> +       int fault;
> +
> +       pagefault_disable();
> +       fault = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr,
> +                                                       sizeof(opcode));
> +       pagefault_enable();
> +
> +       if (unlikely(fault)) {
> +               /*
> +                * XXX: read_opcode() lacks FOLL_FORCE, it can fail if
> +                * we race with another thread which does mprotect(NONE)
> +                * after we hit bp.
> +                */
> +               if (read_opcode(current->mm, vaddr, &opcode))
> +                       return -EFAULT;
> +       }
> +
> +       return is_swbp_insn(&opcode);
> +} 

Why bother with the pagefault_disable() and unlikely fault case and not
simply do copy_from_user() and have it deal with the fault if its needed
anyway?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/