[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1204161335420.16373@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:02:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Steven Young <sdyoung@...20.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arcnet: rimi: Fix device name in debug output
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012, Steven Young wrote:
>
> This patch corrects an incorrectly-used format string that causes messages
> like:
>
> arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0
>
> to appear in dmesg at boot/modprobe time for the arcnet-rimi driver and
> others. This applies to linux-3.3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Young <sdyoung@...20.org>
>
> ---
>
> --- linux-3.3-orig/drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c 2012-03-18 23:15:34.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-3.3/drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c 2012-04-15 15:50:24.000000000 +0100
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_arcdev(const ch
> struct net_device *dev;
>
> dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct arcnet_local),
> - name && *name ? name : "arc%d", arcdev_setup);
> + name && *name ? name : "arcnet", arcdev_setup);
> if(dev) {
> struct arcnet_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
> spin_lock_init(&lp->lock);
I don't think this is correct. The only problem with you seeing the
message above is that it's printed before register_netdev() happpens
(which is where the resolution of the name in the formatstring happens).
But your change will alter the naming of the devices completely ....
I propose the minimalistic fix instead ... it'd be better to just drop the
BUGMSG() thing altogether and convert it to dev_printk(), but that'd be
larger revamp of the driver, and such effort is questionable for something
like Arcnet :)
Adding proper CCs.
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] arcnet: rimi: Fix device name in debug output
arcrimi_probe() calls BUGMSG() before register_netdev() happens. BUGMSG()
itself prints dev->name, but as the format string hasn't been expanded by
register_netdev() yet, the output contains bogus device name such as
arc%d: Given: node 00h, shmem 0h, irq 0
As we don't know the device name yet, just drop the prefix completely from
the debugging messages.
Reported-by: Steven Young <sdyoung@...20.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
---
drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c b/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c
index 25197b6..b8b4c7b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/arcnet/arc-rimi.c
@@ -89,16 +89,16 @@ static int __init arcrimi_probe(struct net_device *dev)
BUGLVL(D_NORMAL) printk(VERSION);
BUGLVL(D_NORMAL) printk("E-mail me if you actually test the RIM I driver, please!\n");
- BUGMSG(D_NORMAL, "Given: node %02Xh, shmem %lXh, irq %d\n",
+ BUGLVL(D_NORMAL) printk("Given: node %02Xh, shmem %lXh, irq %d\n",
dev->dev_addr[0], dev->mem_start, dev->irq);
if (dev->mem_start <= 0 || dev->irq <= 0) {
- BUGMSG(D_NORMAL, "No autoprobe for RIM I; you "
+ BUGLVL(D_NORMAL) printk("No autoprobe for RIM I; you "
"must specify the shmem and irq!\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
if (dev->dev_addr[0] == 0) {
- BUGMSG(D_NORMAL, "You need to specify your card's station "
+ BUGLVL(D_NORMAL) printk("You need to specify your card's station "
"ID!\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int __init arcrimi_probe(struct net_device *dev)
* will be taken.
*/
if (!request_mem_region(dev->mem_start, MIRROR_SIZE, "arcnet (90xx)")) {
- BUGMSG(D_NORMAL, "Card memory already allocated\n");
+ BUGLVL(D_NORMAL) printk("Card memory already allocated\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
return arcrimi_found(dev);
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists