linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: da7210: Add support for PLL and SRM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120416140719.GC3219@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:07:20 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com>
Cc:	lrg <lrg@...com>, alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	"kuninori.morimoto.gx" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: da7210: Add support for PLL and SRM

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:

> Thanks for bearing with me Mark. But the only other way I can think is
> to make the *extra* info like master/slave and fs a part of array itself
> and then search through the array to get required divisors. In this
> case, every time I need to search through entire array to pick up
> correct divisors. Wouldn't that be inefficient, especially when the
> array indexes are fixed? Or the readability/maintainability of that
> would outweigh slight performance overhead?

If there is a genuine performance concern there's plenty of other ways
to do it which would make it run faster.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)