[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8C33E0.2080007@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:59:44 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@....org>, Sheng Yang <sheng@...ker.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
On 16/04/12 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.04.12 at 20:20, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>>
>> The sched clock was considered stable based on the capabilities of the
>> underlying hardware. This does not make sense for Xen PV guests as:
>> a) the hardware TSC is not used directly as the clock source; and b)
>> guests may migrate to hosts with different hardware capabilities.
>>
>> It is not clear to me whether the Xen clock source is supposed to be
>> stable and whether it should be stable across migration. For a clock
>> source to be stable it must be: a) monotonic; c) synchronized across
>> CPUs; and c) constant rate.
Tim, Thomas, can you comment on the above paragraph? Is it correct?
>> There have also been reports of systems with apparently unstable
>> clocks where clearing sched_clock_stable has fixed problems with
>> migrated VMs hanging.
>>
>> So, always set the sched clock as unstable when using the Xen clock
>> source.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/time.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> index 0296a95..8469b5a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>> do_settimeofday(&tp);
>>
>> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
>> + sched_clock_stable = 0;
>
> This, unfortunately, is not sufficient afaict: If a CPU gets brought up
> post-boot, the variable may need to be cleared again. Instead you
> ought to call mark_tsc_unstable().
Yeah, mark_tsc_unstable() is the right thing to do.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists