linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120416153224.GF24130@sortiz-mobl>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:32:24 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, k.lewandowsk@...sung.com,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
	myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:22:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 03:19:49PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> > Add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts. The reverse mapping method
> > used is linear mapping since the sub-drivers of max8997 such as regulator
> > and charger drivers can use the max8997 irq_domain to get the linux irq
> > number for max8997 interrupts. All uses of irq_base in platform data and
> > max8997 driver private data are removed.
> 
> > Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
> > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> 
> CCing in Samuel for the MFD review - review tends to be faster if you CC
> maintainers!  Samuel, there's a followup patch for the regulator API
> which is likely to collide with some API updates so is it OK to merge
> via regulator if the patch is OK?
Yes, the patch looks fine, you can merge it through the regulator tree with my

Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>

if you think that's necessary.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/