[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120416204815.GB24884@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:48:15 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <chuckebbert.lk@...il.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] i387: ptrace breaks the lazy-fpu-restore logic
Starting from 7e16838d "i387: support lazy restore of FPU state"
we assume that fpu_owner_task doesn't need restore_fpu_checking()
on the context switch, its FPU state should match what we already
have in the FPU on this CPU.
However, debugger can change the tracee's FPU state, in this case
we should reset fpu.last_cpu to ensure fpu_lazy_restore() can't
return true.
Change init_fpu() to do this, it is called by user_regset->set()
methods.
Reported-by: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/i387.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index 7734bcb..2d6e649 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ int init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (tsk_used_math(tsk)) {
if (HAVE_HWFP && tsk == current)
unlazy_fpu(tsk);
+ tsk->thread.fpu.last_cpu = ~0;
return 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists